Who pays — the tenant or the landlord? The answer depends on the cause, which is exactly why establishing the cause matters to both sides.
A dispute about mould in a rented flat is almost always a dispute about the cause. The landlord thinks the tenant does not air the place; the tenant thinks the building is damp. Often both are partly right.
| Cause | Usually responsible | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Damaged ventilation, sealed-over ducts | Landlord | Technical condition of the flat |
| Uninsulated external wall, cold bridge | Landlord / building | Structural problem |
| Pipe leak inside a wall | Landlord / property manager | Building services |
| Drying laundry indoors without airing | Tenant | How the flat is used |
| Windows never opened | Tenant | How the flat is used |
| Roof leak on the top floor | Property manager | Common structure |
We are not lawyers and we do not give legal assessments. But we can state the technical cause — and in practice that is usually what resolves the dispute, because both sides are looking at the same measurement.
The dispute ends the moment both sides are looking at one measurement rather than one patch.
In practice the situation is rarely clear-cut. The typical picture: a flat in a panel block, an external wall corner in the bedroom with a cold bridge — a structural matter. At the same time laundry is dried in the room and it is never aired — a usage matter. Neither factor alone might have produced the patch. Together they produce it reliably. A measurement shows that, and from there the parties agree who does what.
The type of building changes where responsibility most likely sits, because it changes the possible causes.
A record of hygrometer readings with dates is a stronger argument than it seems. If humidity in the room is consistently 45–55% and the patch is still growing, that points to the structure rather than to how the flat is used. If the reading is 75% and laundry is drying in the bedroom, that is visible too, and there is no point running from it — better to change it before the conversation starts.
One thing landlords are worth knowing: a cold bridge in an external wall corner is a property of the structure, not a consequence of how the tenant behaves. It can be softened with routine — furniture away from the wall, more frequent airing, a warmer room — but it cannot be removed by making demands of a tenant. If the patch comes back every winter in the same corner regardless of who lives in the flat, the answer is in the structure.
If the cause is in the common parts — a shared ventilation shaft, the roof, the facade, shared pipework, the basement — it is not something the tenant or the individual flat owner can resolve alone. It has to be addressed to the property manager.
In practice that means the inspection result has to be specific enough to submit: where it was measured, what the readings were, and what the conclusion about the cause is.
Most disputes about mould in a tenancy collapse not because either side was in the wrong, but because nobody documented anything. A dated photograph and a couple of readings are more than exists in most cases.
A pencil mark with a date is the simplest tool on the whole list and at the same time the most informative. If after a month the patch has crossed the line, the situation is getting worse, and both sides can see that without any interpretation.
Handing the flat back at the end of a tenancy is a situation of its own. Here the dispute is often about whether the mould was already there when the tenant moved in or appeared during the tenancy, and usually nobody can answer, because nobody documented anything at the start.
The simplest solution for both sides is dated photographic records both on moving in and on moving out, and a note on the condition of the rooms in the handover record. It takes fifteen minutes and removes most of the later dispute.
If the flat is being prepared for a new tenancy cycle, treatment is often combined with ozone treatment of the rooms, to clear any remaining smell from textiles and hard-to-reach places at the same time. That is a separate step, and it only works if the fungus has been removed first and the structure is dry.
Inspection with moisture readings from €40. Treatment from €1.50/m², minimum from €80. If the flat is being prepared for handover or a new tenancy cycle, treatment is often combined with ozone treatment of the rooms — more about that on the page Disinfection after tenants.
After the inspection we provide a written finding on what was found and the moisture reading results. It is not a legal opinion but a technical description, which is usually enough for the conversation.
Either the tenant or the landlord can order it — it makes no difference to us. In practice it is often paid for by whoever wants to establish the cause, and the parties settle it between them afterwards.
Yes. Arrangements can be made remotely — after the inspection we send the findings and a quote, and start work once it is approved.
Describe the situation — we will tell you whether treatment is needed at all, and which one.
Fill in the form — we will call you on the number you provide, ask a few clarifying questions and propose a solution.
Thank you! We will contact you on the phone number you provided shortly.